alloymap.EnglishOunce Works ↗

AlloyMap 홈으로

Silafont-38

Silafont-38 / AlSi9MnMgZn (RHEINFELDEN ALLOYS) | 고압 다이캐스팅

제조사가 보고한 값입니다. 인증된 설계 허용값으로 사용하지 마세요. 출처 보기 ↗

출처 문서의 제목과 조건 설명은 출처 언어 그대로, 공정 항목의 값·보류 사유·검토 메모는 영어 그대로 표시하며 번역하지 않습니다. 숫자, 단위, 질별, 합금 지정도 번역하지 않습니다.

검토를 마친 완전한 기계적 조건이 없습니다. 별도로 검토한 물성 관측값은 아래에 있습니다.

화학 조성

검토를 마친 질량 백분율(wt%) 한계만 표시합니다. 비어 있는 한계는 다른 쪽 한계만 보고되었다는 뜻입니다.

원소 / 출처 표기하한 wt%상한 wt%
Fe—0.15
Cu0.10.4
Ti—0.15

The original supplier's 2015 and 2017 Silafont-38 editions differ in Si, Mn, Mg and Zn composition intervals and F/T6 mechanical ranges; the current family page repeats the 2015 mechanical table. Only matching chemistry cells and mechanical partial observations are published. The 2016 physical table conflicts with 2017 for density, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity; those are held. 2016-only heat-treated physical entries are edition-labelled and not transferred to a 2017 formulation. Sr and Zr rows are not treated as equivalent. The 2017 detailed specimen tables mix AlSi9MnMgZn headers with AlSi9MnMgZr captions and are not digitized. No composite mechanical chart is constructed from the editions.

물리·열 물성

물성보고된 값단위조건
영률74–83GPa2016 primary-alloys handbook edition; heat-treatable alloy in heat-treated state; test temperature not reported
열팽창2110⁻⁶/K2016 primary-alloys handbook edition; heat-treatable alloy in heat-treated state; 20–200 °C
선수축률0.4–0.6%HPDC; original-supplier 2015 processing comparison and 2017 physical table; casting geometry not specified

가공 특성

출처가 보고한 비교이며 인증된 한계값이 아닙니다.

물성보고된 값
mold releaseSupplier describes low die/mold sticking tendency; no numeric adhesion or release test is supplied.
절삭성Supplier describes excellent machinability; no quantitative cutting protocol is supplied.

추가 물성 데이터

출처가 보고한 값, 규격 구간, 최솟값(이상), 상한(미만 또는 이하)을 표시합니다. 평균은 출처가 평균으로 보고한 경우에만 평균이라고 표기합니다. 사용하기 전에 조건을 비교하세요.

물성값조건
인장강도270–300 MPaHPDC; F; 2015 and 2017 supplier performance rows agree on this cell; wall and specimen size not reported
연신율6–9 %HPDC; T6; water quench; 2015 and 2017 supplier performance rows agree on this cell; wall and specimen size not reported

검토 중인 데이터

Composition Si 보류: The 2015 and 2017 original-supplier Si composition limits differ. Do not merge editions or publish one specification without issuer clarification.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 composition_Si comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 composition_Si comparison

Composition Mn 보류: The 2015 and 2017 original-supplier Mn composition limits differ. Do not merge editions or publish one specification without issuer clarification.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 composition_Mn comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 composition_Mn comparison

Composition Mg 보류: The 2015 and 2017 original-supplier Mg composition limits differ. Do not merge editions or publish one specification without issuer clarification.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 composition_Mg comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 composition_Mg comparison

Composition Zn 보류: The 2015 and 2017 original-supplier Zn composition limits differ. Do not merge editions or publish one specification without issuer clarification.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 composition_Zn comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 composition_Zn comparison

항복강도 보류: The same HPDC F YTS performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

연신율 보류: The same HPDC F Elongation performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 elongation comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 elongation comparison

항복강도 보류: The same HPDC T6; water quench YTS performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

인장강도 보류: The same HPDC T6; water quench UTS performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 ultimate_tensile_strength comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 ultimate_tensile_strength comparison

항복강도 보류: The same HPDC T6; air quench YTS performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 yield_strength comparison

인장강도 보류: The same HPDC T6; air quench UTS performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 ultimate_tensile_strength comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 ultimate_tensile_strength comparison

연신율 보류: The same HPDC T6; air quench Elongation performance interval differs between 2015 and 2017 original-supplier editions. Neither range is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition ↗ — PDF p. 2, Silafont-38 elongation comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 elongation comparison

밀도 보류: The original-supplier 2016 physical summary and 2017 structural-casts edition report different density; no blend or preferred value is published.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2016 edition ↗ — PDF p. 80, Silafont-38 density comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 density comparison

열전도율 보류: The original-supplier 2016 physical summary and 2017 structural-casts edition report different thermal_conductivity; no blend or preferred value is published.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2016 edition ↗ — PDF p. 80, Silafont-38 thermal_conductivity comparison

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 thermal_conductivity comparison

전기전도도 보류: The original-supplier 2016 physical summary gives 36.0–38.0 %IACS, while the 2017 structural-casts edition gives 36.0–41.5 %IACS. Neither interval is selected.

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2016 edition ↗ — PDF p. 81, Silafont-38 electrical conductivity facing row, %IACS column

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition ↗ — PDF p. 9, Silafont-38 electrical conductivity physical-table column

근거

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2015 edition — RHEINFELDEN ALLOYS GmbH & Co. KG

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2016 edition — RHEINFELDEN ALLOYS GmbH & Co. KG

Silafont-38 original-supplier 2017 edition — RHEINFELDEN ALLOYS GmbH & Co. KG

값마다 정확한 출처 위치 보기

공식 발행기관 페이지